Monday, April 30, 2007

Green Building Tour

I am going on a tour today of the Chesapeake Bay Foundation building, which the rich environmentalists so ironically call the "Fish Shack." I am going through work- our head of "Vertical Construction" is taking us there on a bus. The Fish Shack tours are so popular that they have a tour guide and they charge money. The building we are going to today is LEED platinum (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design is a building industry standard for green construction and you get different certification levels depending on how green you are). My old grad school Alma Mater, Bren School of Environmental Science and Management at UC Santa Barbara, is also LEED Platinum (also in a sensitive coastal area- how do people get away with this?). I will learn some cool things today and pass them on to you. In the meantime, check out my last post about the Green Building network.

Update: The tour was very well attended by leadership at Frederick County, including a bunch of Directors and Department Heads involved in constructing and maintaining County buildings. It reflected the interest in these folks as well as the Board of County Commissioners' new strategic plan element that calls for LEED certification.

What did I learn? First of all, I learned that CBF was able to build on an existing pool and poolhouse site from an old inn and that is how they were able to have their facility on the beach. Second of all I learned that I would be much more productive and call in sick less often if my office had natural light, windows that open and give fresh air, a large airy cafeteria, and views of the beach from my office. So I highly recommend this for everyone. Third, I learned about a few great applications of green building materials and a few not-so-great. The great and not-so-great (quoted from the CBF website, with my comments in blue):

  • Good: Insulation: Structural Insulated Panels (SIPs), used as an alternative to conventional framing, require considerably less wood and have a higher R-Value. (The higher the R-value of a material, the better it is at resisting heat loss or heat gain.) The SIPs are used for both walls (R 23.5) and ceiling (R 30), which greatly improves the building's "envelope performance" and reduces energy demands. This stuff can be a little hard to work with. The newer version of these panels allows for conduit to go through where the old ones did not. You get a lot of R-value for the thickness.
  • Great: Solar Hot Water Heater: The Merrill Center's solar collector system provides hot water for the building. This renewable energy source minimizes the use of fossil fuel and reduces air pollution. My dad has solar hot water heat for his house and it saves him a ton of money. Solar water heating is efficient because the solar energy can be directly used as heat rather than converted to electrical energy. The more you convert between types of energy, the more energy you lose.
  • Reserving Judgment: Photovoltaic Panels: Photovoltaic solar panels convert solar energy directly to electricity to reduce CBF's dependence on commercially generated electricity. These panels only produce about 5% of the energy for the CBF building. Part of the problem is where they are located on the building. These are also an older generation of solar panels. The new ones are a lot more efficient. They may never pay themselves off but they do reduce outrageous amounts of greenhouse gases.
  • Don't Know: Ground Source Heat Pump: The Merrill Center uses a ground source heat pump system for heating and air conditioning. Forty-eight wells, each 300 feet deep, utilize the earth's constant temperature as a heat sink in the summer and heat source in the winter. I am a big fan of the idea of geothermal heat. I could not tell from the tour how well this worked in this commercial application. The Liberty Village Cohousing Community in Libertytown has geothermal heat in the houses and they love it. They say it is very comfortable and saves a lot of money.
  • Good, Bad, and Reserving Judgment: Cork flooring and wall panels come from cork oak trees. Cork, which is harvested without killing the tree, regenerates in seven to nine years. Bamboo, used for the stairs and flooring in the lobby, can be harvested every three to five years and replenishes itself naturally. Posts, beams, and trusses are made from Parallam--Parallel Strand Lumber, utilizing wood that is usually wasted. I have cork laminate floor in my kitchen and love it. But the cork tiles at CBF looked terrible. I can't tell if it was the material, the installation or the application but it did not work well there. I reserve judgement for now but can tell you that I love the ones in my house. The bamboo seemed to be holding up really well. It was a little dinged up but they only wax the floors twice a year. Plus you can get bamboo now that is stained and does not show marks as much, The Parallam was very cool- a highlight. There were also cementitious fiberboard panels for the exterior of the building that we happen to be using for the Thurmont Library- very cool. The MDF interior trim looked horrible and I suggest using the recycled trim that they sell at every hardware store that is made from recycled polystyrene- not that I love styrofoam, but as long as they make it somebody should recycle it into the building industry's product of the year. Check out the top green building products of 2006 in this link.
  • Great: Certified Wood:The wood in this building (decks, plywood, and all dimensional wood) is either certified by the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) or drawn from sustainably managed forests. FSC forests are managed to conserve biological diversity, protect endangered species and their habitats, and encourage forest regeneration and succession. The wood is harvested using methods that control erosion and minimize forest damage. To build the Merrill Center, CBF placed the largest single order of certified wood to date. This is a little-known element of LEED certification that a lot of people do not take advantage of.
  • Outstanding: Water: The Rainwater Catchment System--roof, gutters, storage tanks, and filters)--reuses rainwater for everything but the kitchen sink and showers and reduces the need to draw from groundwater wells or from municipal water systems. Rainwater is used for fire suppression, hand washing, mop sinks, the desiccant unit make-up, laundry, and gear-washing equipment. This also reduces the amount of water that would flow out of the building and into the Bay, carrying pollutants with it. Altogether, the Merrill Center uses 90% less water than a typical office. The building as a whole uses about 90 gallons per day. THE BUILDING AS A WHOLE. This is amazing. We don't need to use drinking water for all water applications and this building really demonstrates that too.
  • Mixed Review: Daylighting: A large expanse of southern glass with exterior shading is balanced by high northern clerestory windows and dormers for an even distribution of daylighting throughout the building. When sunlight is abundant, light sensors and electronic dimmers minimize the use of electric lighting. The building is very bright. The natural light seems excellent and since I love light, this would be a place for me. Because of all of the windows and some shady areas created by the solar panels, parts of this building get really cold in the winter. The building can get very hot in the summer, even with all of the shading. Some of this can be fixed but not all. An office like this requires a culture change.
  • Great: Composting toilets: Our composting toilets use no water at all. Human waste is composted naturally to produce topsoil for our landscaping. This saves water and reduces the load on sewage treatment plants that contribute nutrient pollution to the Bay. CBF uses Clivus Multrum toilets. ThorpeWood uses these toilets also. They mulch human waste. Everyone who has them swears they are the greatest things ever. Just don't fall in- it's a long way down. Everyone who has these toilets sounds like a cult member. If there are any problems with them, I doubt anyone will ever tell me. Or maybe they are just that good. They do blow a breeze on your butt.
  • Great: Local Materials: The Merrill Center conserves energy and reduces pollution (in this case vehicle fuel), by using local materials. More than half of the materials for this building came from within a radius of 300 miles. Worth looking for.
  • Great: Minimal Materials: The Merrill Center design also conserved resources simply by using less materials. The exposed structure is visible because CBF used almost no interior walls and no fancy finishes. This creates a very modern, exposed architecture look.

Friday, April 27, 2007

Network for Green Building

The Maryland Green Building Network is a terrific place to learn about - what else - green building in Maryland. The network has regular meetings and an awesome listserv where they share info about upcoming events, regulations, recent press, innovations, etc. If you are interested in Green Building, especially in Maryland, I strongly suggest you connect with this group. Sean McGuire manages the network and must be thrilled at the support from the current administration as compared to the last, which completely gutted the program and its staff. Here are some things from the last email I got plus links to the program.


Governor Signs onto RGGI and Creates Climate Change Commission
On Friday, April 20, Governor O’Malley signed onto the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) and signed an Executive Order creating a Commission on Climate Change. For more information:
News: www.baltimoresun.com/news/local/bay_environment/bal-green0420,1,6622931.story
Exec Order: www.gov.state.md.us/pressreleases/070420.html

Baltimore Green Week
Week of May 5 – 11, 2007 Throughout Baltimore, MD
For a schedule of all events, please visit www.baltimoregreenweek.org.

Green Building Day & Public Hearings
May 8th Baltimore
The Baltimore City Council public hearing reviews 3 of the 4 new green bills. (10-12pm) Following the hearing will be a free lunch donated by Chipotle’s and, at 1:30pm, panel discussions focused 1) on healthy hospitals, schools and community buildings and 2) residential design and construction, and affordable housing. Parking may also be free. The event takes place at the beautifully green retrofitted Frederick Douglass-Isaac Myers Maritime Park at 1417 Thames Street.

USGBC BALTIMORE REGIONAL CHAPTER PRESENTS
Deconstruction, Architectural Salvage and Everything Else That’s Left
Thursday, May 17 6:00pm
Second Chance, Inc. Baltimore, MD
For more info visit www.usgbcbalt.org.

Green Building Institute’s Green Roof Bus Tour
Saturday, May 19, 2007 Washington, DC
A green roof is vegetation incorporated into a rooftop. Green roofs have countless benefits including extended roof life, insulation, stormwater management, LEED credits, temperature moderation, reduced carbon dioxide, reduced energy costs and much more.
To register, please visit:
http://www.greenbuildinginstitute.org/pages/courses/GreenRoofBusTour.html

Exploring Excellence in Sustainable Architecture and Design
June 14, 2007 7:00-9:00pm
Rosslyn Spectrum Theater, Arlington, VA
Can “green” buildings be beautiful? On June 14th, 2007, the third installment of Arlington’s Architecture Speaker Series will explore this question. Arlington is already recognized as a national leader in green building practices, and continues to explore how we can do more. And with our Fresh AIRE: Arlington Initiative to Reduce Emissions campaign, we are taking a number of steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and help fight global warming. This program features two well-known design professionals who will explore how sustainable architecture can contribute to design excellence in the civic realm, while creating energy efficient, resource efficient, and environmentally sensitive buildings where people live, work, and play. Question and answer session will follow the presentations. For more information, please visit the Arlington County Architecture Speaker Series web page

The Associated Press: "Md. Toughens Car Emissions"
http://www.wtopnews.com/index.php?nid=598&sid=1124454

The Washington Post: "Md. Bills To Cut Pollution Signed"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/24/AR2007042401007.html

The Baltimore Sun: "O'Malley signs environmental bills"
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/local/bal-te.md.environment25apr25,0,529191.story?coll=bal-local-headlines

Thursday, April 26, 2007

Tree Planting remarks

I got to give a few brief remarks at the opening of Utica Park today (Thurmont, MD) about the tree planting last weekend. A number of the volunteers were at the opening, including the Frederick Pedalers Bicycle Club (with helmets with strange little rear-view mirrors, special jerseys, etc.) and Boy Scout Troop 570 (in uniform). My people have flair. I got to mention Commissioner Hagen's remarks about the importance of Parks for the environment, and I once again used the info from EPA that an acre of trees removes 2.5 tons of CO2 per year and releases 2 tons of oxygen.

There were also Commissioner Gray, State Delegates, and what-have-you at the event including Paul Stull and reps for Galen Clagett and Sue Hecht. Always good to give the environment face-time with the bigwigs- and to remind people that global warming is real.

How a bill becomes a law II

Yesterday I was in a rush, so I only briefly outlined a few highlights from Governor O'Malley's signing frenzy on 4/24. Here is a more complete listing, pulled from the MLIS:

SB 103/ HB 131: MARYLAND CLEAN CARS ACT OF 2007
Requiring the Department of the Environment, in consultation with the Motor Vehicle Administration, to adopt regulations by December 31, 2007,to establish a low emissions vehicle program applicable to specified vehicles; authorizing a modification concerning the applicability of the program to vehicles of specified model years; requiring the Department to establish motor vehicle emissions standards and compliance requirements;prohibiting the Department or any other State agency from adopting aspecified regulation; etc.
EFFECTIVE JUNE 1, 2007

SB 332/ HB 942: MARYLAND GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL
Establishing the Maryland Green Building Council in the Department ofGeneral Services; providing for the membership and terms of the Council; prohibiting specified members of the Council from receiving compensation for serving on the Council; authorizing specified members to receive specified reimbursement; requiring the Governor to appoint the chair;providing that the Council may act with an affirmative vote of a specified number of members; etc.
EFFECTIVE JUNE 1, 2007

SB 595/ HB1016: ELECTRICITY – NET ENERGY METERING – RENEWABLE ENERGY PORTFOLIO STANDARD – SOLAR ENERGY
Increasing the maximum installed capacity available for net energy metering to eligible customer–generators in the State; increasing the amount of generating capacity of an electric generating system that an eligible customer–generator may use for net metering; requiring the Public Service Commission to make a specified determination concerning dual metering for specified eligible customer–generators; etc.
EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 1, 2007

SB 566: PUBLIC UTILITY COMPANIES – GENERATING STATIONS – WIND
Exempting a specified person from having to obtain a certificate of publicconvenience and necessity for a generating station that produces electricityfrom wind; requiring a person to obtain approval from the Public ServiceCommission prior to any construction of a generating station that produces electricity from wind under specified circumstances; requiring theCommission to provide a specified opportunity for public comment;requiring the Commission to report on specified matters to specifiedpersons; etc.
EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2007

HB 488: ENVIRONMENT – STATEWIDE ELECTRONICS RECYCLING PROGRAM
Altering a specified recycling program to include specified electronicdevices; authorizing a county to address methods for the separate collectionand recycling of specified electronic devices in a specified recycling plan;requiring that specified funds, in excess of a specified amount, revert to the General Fund of the State; requiring manufacturers of specified electronicdevices to submit to the Department a specified registration and fee;repealing the termination date of provisions of a specified Act; etc.
EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 1, 2007

Wednesday, April 25, 2007

How a bill becomes a law

Yesterday was a big day for environmental legislation (and for ex-felons), as our Governor signed a bunch of bills. Visit the Washington Post Article, "Md. Bills To Cut Pollution Signed" from today for a recap. Or read my recap of the recap below as it realtes to global warming.

  • The Clean Cars Act was signed into law, so we will start seeing tougher emissions standards in MD over the next few years.
  • The Governor also voted to create a Green Building Council.
  • The greenhouse gas emissions cap legislation failed before it made it to the Governor.

Environmentalists are calling this a "warmup." It remains to be seen; the next session will be spent balancing the budget and everything else will likely come second.

Monday, April 23, 2007

8 Acres of Trees- plus Pogo-hopping Youngsters!

Well my awesome staff person Kay and our wonderful friend Mike Kay from DNR Forest Service have a planting planned at Libertytown Park tomorrow. A contractor will be mechanically planting 8 acres of trees. Yes! 8! I think Mike has to go in and hand plant a bunch that are in a wet area, so I plan to go there and help him. Plus I need to return his dibble bars and 4 of the 5 mallets he lent me (uh, the other one disappeared). Doing our little calculation, these trees will remove about 20 tons of carbon dioxide from the air each year (2.5 tons per acre) and release about 16 tons of oxygen (2 tons per acre). mmmmm. 16 tons of oxygen. That is some good oxygen. I didn't realize Kay had organized this huge of a planting even though I had mindlessly approved all of her tree purchases. And here I am thinking that planting 3 acres of trees is so hard and Kay just floats on through and gets 8 planted. I am humbled. Way to go Kay.

Our friends from Waterford park made the front page of the News-Post today- some kid jumping on a shovel like it was a pogo stick. Oh to be a tree planting pogo hopping youngster once more.

Update: It was too wet to go plant trees today. It will be even wetter after it rains this week. The trees are sitting in the cooler...

Sunday, April 22, 2007

Happy Earth Day! Go outside!

Yesterday I asked a little girl Danielle why we have Earth Day. She said it's because the earth is in danger from pollution. I told her Earth Day is also a holiday to celebrate the Earth. Then we went about the business of polluting our watershed model with guiltless abandon.

Our tree planting was covered in today's Frederick News-Post: "800 trees added to Utica District Park: Official ribbon-cutting ceremony set for Thursday; playground, baseball fields to open July 2". I got to talk up this Board of County Commissioners. The News-Post also covered the Community Commons Earth Day event (with a picture of our buddy John Smucker, high school teacher and stream restorer extraordinaire) and had an article about global change with an interview with Eric Kindahl of Hood College. Great coverage for our local partners.

Go outside. Now!

Saturday, April 21, 2007

The tree planting is over. Long live the tree planting!

The planting went fine. Actually, it was great. We had a bunch of volunteers come out, mostly thanks to the Potomac Conservancy, the weather was -let's just say it was the best day of the year, the doughnuts were fresh, and the tree stock from Treemendous was really good. We also had volunteers from the New Forest Society, the Boy Scouts, and a Unitarian Universalist Church Youth Group. I think we might have planted around 400 huge trees plus 200 saplings. ( I myself helped plant about 5 and mostly took pictures and drove around because I am special). Though I did not sleep last night for all of the worrying about logistics, everything went as hoped. The Parks staff was in a good mood. They worked super hard. They all seemed to have nicknames like "Sprinkles" and "Team Cobra." I didn't ask. Parks was really grateful for the help getting trees and I tried to explain that I was grateful for the permit credits, but they insisted on being grateful and that was really sweet.

The News Post sent a Photographer and a Writer out. The Emmitsburg Dispatch was also there to write a story about some people who had already left. Oops!

I think we planted 3 acres of trees. According to EPA, that removes 7.5 tons of carbon dioxide and emits 6 tons of oxygen every year.

I left early to give a presentation to kids at the Emmitsburg library about pollution. I was honestly glad that only 2 kids showed up because we got to be low-key and the two girls each got to put a crazy amount of pollution on the watershed model. I was also glad that the crowd was small because maybe those kids got to be outside on such a beautiful day, and also, I was TIRED.

I hope the Big Sweep went well today also.

The real Earth Day is tomorrow. Have fun! It's supposed to be gorgeous.

Friday, April 20, 2007

Plant a Tree Cuz It's Earth Day!

It's Earth Day on Sunday! And that makes this Earth Day Weekend! And I am so busy I feel insane! I spent most of the day getting supplies to plant trees tomorrow at Utica Park. I drove 2 and a half hours today just to get 200 stakes. Somebody take me to dinner, I am TIRED.

I am also speaking at the Emmitsburg Library tomorrow at 11:00 in front of a tough audience of KIDS who want a FUN EARTH DAY EXPERIENCE. So I am going to teach them about pollution. I have this model that looks like a landscape and you put dry "pollution" on it and when you spray the "pollution" it turns lurid purple and red colors and then fills up the reservior with brown murk. Can I tell you my secret? The "pollution" is Kool-Aid. Yes I am crazy like that.

Want to come plant trees tomorrow at 7 in the morning because you are crazy like that?

Frederick County Government, Potomac Conservancy, DNR Forest Service and other partners are sponsoring a volunteer tree planting at the new Utica Park in Thurmont, MD. Come prepared to get dirty. Wear boots and gloves if you have them. The address for Utica Park is 10200-B Old Frederick Road, Thurmont, MD 21788. The planting is from 7AM until noon or whenver all the trees are planted. Refreshments will be provided. Please come prepared for muddy conditions and bring work gloves if you have them.

We are planting about an acre of trees. Remember what we learned this month from The EPA of Many Heads:

Much of Maryland’s loss of forestland is occurring where the trees are needed most, in the urbanized areas of the State. Forests are especially crucial in urbanized areas. One acre of young healthy trees will absorb 2.5 tons of carbon dioxide and give off 2 tons of oxygen each year. Trees also contribute to the improvement of air quality, help control water runoff, moderate the effects of urban heat islands, and often represent the presence of recreational and park spaces.

Monday, April 16, 2007

Step it Up Frederick: a great event to ride a tricycle

If you, like me, did not make it to Step It Up Frederick this weekend because you ran into the curb with your boyfriend's car, exploded the tire, and had to coordinate with AAA to get help putting on a spare because your boyfriend's wheel had locking lug nuts and lug nuts of varying sizes (oh the IRONY, I missed a global warming event because of a car), you may appreciate hearing that Step It Up Frederick was a great success. I did run into Kita Murdock later in the evening at a benefit for Multiple Sclerosis (Lick MS- which was AWESOME- My friend Jeanine and I won a delicious cake from our friend Elin at the silent auction after we beat out this very nice couple at the last second) Kita was very excited about the turnout, the bands had been great, the speakers excellent, and she was glad it was over. She didn't know how the showing of "An Inconvenient Truth" went, which I would have loved to have seen- It was run by Hannah Poffenberger, a local high school student who was specially trained to give it. The Frederick News-Post covered the story yesterday on a front page article, "Local Activists Step It Up: Group hopes to push Congress to take serious look at global warming." The jist?

Residents rode scooters, tricycles and bicycles from Parkway Elementary School to Carroll Creek. There, they gathered on the steps for a photo to send to Congress. Hoping to make their desire clear -- that the United States cut carbon dioxide emissions by 80 percent by 2050 -- the picture will be sent to Washington, along with hundreds of others from similar events across the country.

Friday, April 13, 2007

Montgomery County MD and climate change solutions

I tend to be Frederick-centric here because that is where I live and work- but a number of Counties in Maryland are gearing up to deal with the climate change issue. Montgomery County is environmentally progressive and has initiated a number of actions that would make sense to duplicate in other jurisdictions. The County has especially been the leader with promoting green building design. I would also follow them to see how they implement their GHG emissions inventory, because I bet they will do a bang-up job. Even some of the smaller initiatives, like replacing signal lights with LED lights makes a lot of sense. Here is some information about what Montgomery County has been up to:

Policy Initiatives:

  • Council Resolution 14-582 : A Resolution by the Montgomery County Council Supporting Participation in the Cities for Climate Protection Campaign
  • Council Resolution 15-1529 (County Energy Policy)
  • International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI): Montgomery County is an active member of Cities for Climate Protection, a global effort coordinated by ICLEI. Montgomery County has agreed to analyze the greenhouse gas emissions within the county and create an action plan to mitigate them.
  • Montgomery County Green Building Legislation: Under Green Building Legislation currently before the Montgomery County Council, public buildings and private buildings over 10,000 square feet will be required to achieve a U.S. Green Building Council LEED NC 2.2 Silver rating.
  • Montgomery County Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory: In 2001 Montgomery County analyzed the sources and volume of greenhouse gases emitted by the county government and the public. However, Montgomery County has grown since 2001, and it is necessary to re-evaluate our local emissions. DEP's Climate Action Team is currently reviewing local greenhouse gas emissions and will release a new report in 2007. This report will help Montgomery County Government identify policies and programs to reduce Montgomery County’s impact on our environment and on climate change.

Montgomery County Government Operations:

  • Green Power Purchase: In 2004, Montgomery County led a group of local governments and agencies in a wind energy purchase that represents 5 percent of the buying group’s total electricity needs (76,000 MWH over 2 years). In 2007 and 2008, the group increased its purchase of wind energy 10 percent to 56,000 million MWH annually.
  • LED Traffic Signal Installation: Montgomery County will replace standard incandescent signal lamps with light-emitting diodes (LED) on 250 intersections throughout the County by 2008.
  • Low Emission Vehicle Purchase: Since 1995, Montgomery County has purchased 150 Clean Natural Gas (CNG) transit buses, and 14 hybrid transit buses, and 121 ethanol flex fuel vehicles.
  • Street Tree Planting and Maintenance Program: Montgomery County significantly increased funding to plant and maintain street trees in county-maintained rights-of-way. Street trees help to absorb rainwater from otherwise impervious surfaces, and cycle carbon dioxide out of the air.
Consumer Programs

  • Clean Energy Rewards: Montgomery County is supporting an innovative program to incentivize clean energy purchased by County residents, small businesses, and other organizations. The program will reward 1 cent per kilowatt-hour (kWh) to residential end-users, and a 1.5 cents per kWh to non-residential end-users. The program started January 1, 2007, and can support 31,000 MWH of clean energy.
  • DEP Energy-Efficiency Workshops: DEP routinely conducts workshops to educate the public on energy-efficiency measures that can be implemented in their homes and businesses. Content ranges from no to low-cost energy savers to comprehensive energy upgrades. Collectively, the 2006 sessions served over 150 residents. Subscribe to the e-newsletter, Energy InfoWire, to receive energy-efficiency tips and workshop information.
  • Montgomery County Shade to Save Program: Montgomery County initiated a program to strategically plant shade trees in multi-family housing communities with little existing canopy coverage and a high volume of impervious surfaces. Trees help to shade building surfaces (minimizes the "heat island" effect), and air-conditioning units (minimizes additional energy use to cool and condition air).

Thursday, April 12, 2007

Council of Governments passes climate change initiative

There's so much good news on the local government front the past few days- today I read in Southern Maryland Online "Regional Leaders Respond to Climate Change Threat" that the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (MWCOG, which includes Frederick County) voted unanimously yesterday to "pass a regional climate change initiative that will unite efforts to reduce greenhouse gases in the National Capital Region."

Leaders are concerned especially because of the amount of land in the region that adjoins the Chesapeake Bay. They are concerned that the rising sea levels will cause the Chesapeake Bay to become contaminated with salt. Combine that with a predicted influx of 2 million people to the region in the next 25 years and the Bay becomes a murky salt marsh.

What the initiative will do (from the MWCOG website):

"The Board vote paves the way for a new Climate Change Steering Committee to make recommendations for reducing the region's greenhouse gas emissions. In addition to establishing a reduction goal for the region, the committee will consider several other action items, including: "

  • Measuring local greenhouse gas emissions and their impact on the region;
  • Preparing a catalogue of activities currently underway in local jurisdictions;
  • Identifying best practices for local governments;
  • Recommending climate change policy and potential advocacy positions on federal, state and local climate change proposals.

"The steering committee will meet for one year, and will be charged with developing a climate change work program for the region. "

Good for them. They have a tough job ahead of them.

Wednesday, April 11, 2007

County Commissioners endorse Climate Protection Act

On April 9, the Board of County Commissioners of Frederick County, MD voted 3-2 (Gardner, Gray & Hagen - Jenkins & Thompson) to endorse the U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement. For a link to the brief, click here. Notably, Commissioner Gardner initiated the brief. Anne Arundel and Howard Counties have also signed onto the agreement.

The agreements accepts the findings of IPCC scientists, discusses potential impacts from climate change, sets the goal to reduce global warming pollutants 7% below 1990 levels by 2012, focuses on energy conservation and efficiencies, encourages Congress to act in an affirmative and systematic way, and commits to local actions.

Local actions include:

  • Inventory greenhouse gas pollutants, set reduction targets and create an action plan
  • change land-use policies to reduce sprawl, preserve open space, and create walkable communities
  • promote alternative transportation
  • increase the use of green energy
  • increase energy efficiency through mechanisms like building codes and facility retrofits
  • purchase energy star appliances
  • promote LEED standards in building construction
  • increase the fuel efficiency of vehicles and adopt other fleet policies
  • increase recycling rates
  • maintain healthy urban forests and promote tree planting
  • educate people
I am not sure why Thompson and Jenkins did not sign on. I don't know Jenkins well enough to say. Thompson is usually pro environment so I am sure he had another reason.

According to the Step It Up Frederick blog, Commissioner Kai Hagen will attend the Step It Up Frederick event on April 14th to read the resolution.

I am really proud of our Commissioners for making this step. I have a really high opinion of these people having worked for them and I know they will do the best they can to turn this commitment into a reality.

Monday, April 9, 2007

Rising Temperatures vs. Catoctin Brook Trout

As part of my job-job, I develop plans to protect water quality and habitat for Frederick County, Maryland. Part of that means being involved in initiatives like the Maryland Brook Trout Alliance (MBTA), a statewide initiative designed to protect and restore brook trout populations and habitat. (I was the Secretary/Treasurer of this organization last year). We have a local effort that is part of the MBTA, which we call CAMBI. We call it CAMBI because Catoctin, Antietam, & Monocacy Brookie Initiative is just kind of unwieldy.

I have been working on a local strategy document for about a year that talks about brook trout populations in the region, what they need to survive, and what conditions will kill them off. The MD Department of Natural Resources has put out a Brook Trout Fisheries Management Plan that has a lot of this information also. Brook Trout are a coldwater fish- they need conditions between 32-75.2 degrees F to survive, with more stable populations under 66.2 degrees F. Stream temperatures are directly affected by air temperatures. With a groundwater temperature increase of 3.6-7.2 degrees F, brook trout are predicted to become extinct in many parts of Maryland, including Frederick County. Remember the EPA document that I reviewed last week from their "Climate Change- State and Local Governments" website? It said that a "primary response to climate change in the State may be a 2º F rise in air temperature by 2030 and 8º F increase by 2100." Do the math.

Local brook trout made the Washington Post on March 19, 2007 with the article, "Warming Imperils Maryland Species: Scientists Fear Loss of Baltimore Oriole, Native Brook Trout:"

Researchers have begun trying to learn how that trend is changing the surrounding ecosystems, from the wooded ridge of Catoctin Mountain to the weedy bottom of the bay. So far, the evidence is spotty, anecdotal and often inconclusive -- but it can still be arresting, when it shows eons-old processes threatened by change.

The work has taken them to such places as Little Fishing Creek, a glass-clear stream running through woods north of Frederick City. Brook trout, which once lived all over the Washington area, remain there. They were decimated by urban pollution, and officials fear that climate change will finish them off.

"All it takes is a couple of degrees to lose those fish," said Don Cosden, a state fisheries official.

The local trout prefer water colder than 68 degrees, he said. Already, streams such as this one can get that hot on summer days. State officials estimate that the fish might be gone from central Maryland in less than a century -- although they would probably survive in the cooler western mountains and in states farther north.

"This habitat is right on the edge of their ability to survive," Cosden said. "If you throw climate change in on top of that . . . then you hit a tolerance level that can take out a whole population."

With predictions like these, the MBTA's parent group, the Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture (EBTJV-part of the National Fisheries Habitat Initiative) has deprioritized saving the brook trout in our area. If our area is slated to go extinct, why not focus on areas like the Savage River that have more stable populations? Well, several reasons:
  • The genetic material in the brook trout of this region is different from other regions and is important for genetic diversity;
  • This area is full of cold springs that may protect small enclaves of trout even in the face of climate change;
  • The brook trout aren't dead yet- they are out there hanging on and nobody can say that it is impossible to protect them because of uncertainties in the predictions and in how people will act to control greenhouse gases;
  • I live HERE. Here is what matters to me. These are our trout and I feel responsible to them. After all, I dream of fish.
References:
Meisner, J.D. “Effect of Climate Warming on the Southern Margins of the Native Range of Brook Trout, Salveinus fontinalis”. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 47:1065-1070. 1990.

Heft, Alan A., ed. 2006 Maryland Brook Trout Fisheries Management Plan. Prepared by Maryland Department of Natural Resources Fisheries Service Inland Fisheries Management Division.

Diplomats water down the IPCC report, sea level increases

This Sunday I was innocently eating a delicious pecan pancake at the Village and reading the Frederick News-Post when I read the horrible news (see the same AP release at this site) about how diplomats watered down the science in the IPCC report. (Background: The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change recently published a draft report of its 4th assessment on climate change. This draft becomes final once the diplomats for the various countries can agree to the language in it. The draft was finalized April 6th.) Chinese and Saudi diplomats refused to sign off on the report because it had a 90% certainty to the scientific estimates. They wanted it to say 80%. Eventually the US brokered a deal where no confidence intervals were used. And then there was an issue of hundreds of millions of people being potential flood victims that was watered down to "millions." Reportedly these was no conflict in the science, just in the diplomacy, and "at one point, NASA's Cynthia Rosenzweig filed a formal protest and left the building, only to return, make peace and talk in positive tones." What is interesting to those of us who care about reality is that the report is toned down but the 76-page TECHNICAL APPENDIX will be published in its entirety without diplomatic mushmush.

Friday, April 6, 2007

Maryland's Contributon to Global Warming

Here it is as I promised- an overview of Maryland's contributions of greenhouse gases from an EPA analysis done using 1999 data. I am getting this information from the same EPA publication I reviewed yesterday.

Over 90% of Maryland's GHG emissions are from Carbon Dioxide. 76.3 million tons of CO2 were released in Maryland in 1999. In 1999, Maryland's CO2 contributions came from the following sources:

  • 37% utilities
  • 38% transportation
  • 10% industrial
  • 6% commercial
  • 9% residential

Within the utilities sector, the following uses are further broken down:

  • 0.3% transporation
  • 43.7% commercial
  • 16.6% industrial
  • 39.5% residential

To figure out each sector's true contribution, you would multiply the percent from the second list times 37% utilities; to this number you would add the number from the first bulleted list for the sector:

  • (39.5% residential*37% utilities) +9% residential = 26 percent.

This is a little misleading because changes can be made by the utilities sector without the input of its users, but it should give you an idea.

Next scary thought: " If Maryland were an independent country, it would rank 13th worldwide in terms of total CO2 emissions". This is true only if you don't count all the other states individually. In terms of states, Maryland ranks number 26 in terms of GHG emissions and 36th per capita. In Maryland in 1999, we released 108.5 metric tons of CO2 for every million dollars of gross state product. We are 25% below the national average, which is better than the national average but still bad. Maryland is number 42 in terms of energy consumption per capita, which means that we are relatively efficient for the average American. For residential use, we are close to the national average. Insulate your houses and get rid of those incandescent bulbs! Our energy consumption per capita per year is about 260 million BTUs. This is equivalent to one of the following (I did this calculation using BTU conversions for your mind to boggle over):

  • 76,201 kilowatt hours
  • 74,285 lbs of wood
  • 37,143 lbs of shelled corn used as fuel
  • 5,200 gallons of ethanol
  • 2,838 gallons of propane
  • 2,080 gallons gasoline
  • 252,427 cubic feet of natural gas
  • 1,733 gallons #6 heating oil
  • 21,666 lbs coal

The predictions for 2020 include a phasing out of oil and a doubling of the use of coal. Under this scenario, CO2 emissions are predicted to increase 49% with an average annual growth of 2.2%. This is nearly equally divided across sectors. The document does not suggest how to reduce these emissions. See the posts here on local solutions as we find them along the way if you want to feel encouraged instead of horribly, horribly in despair.

Thursday, April 5, 2007

The EPA of many heads

In my experience, EPA is so big that one side not only does not know what the other is doing, it may totally contradict the other. On the one hand EPA is busily kowtowing to the Bush Administration to claim that they don't have to regulate greenhouse gases and on the OTHER HAND they are putting out information about the impacts. Anyway, here is a link to an EPA publication about Global Warming in Maryland. They have a nice overview about how greenhouse gases create global warming- I guess somebody briefed them after they lost the Supreme Court case this week. Yes I am gloating.

I learned through this nice little publication that some crap called SF6 has 23,900 times the global warming potential of CO2. What is this stuff? EW!

According to the document, we in Maryland may be at higher risk from:

  • Drought, extreme heat, tornado and thunderstorms, with a lesser risk of flash/river flooding and winter weather. The risk of snow may be lessened and the risk of ice increased. Power outages from storms could become worse. We could see tidal/coastal flooding in Anne Arundel and Calvert Counties. Sewer overflows from more intense storms could become more frequent. Drought could cause problems with adequate water supply.
  • Smog and respiratory problems could increase.
  • Coastal areas, with 10% of the state's population, are expected to be hardest-hit by climate change. Coastal areas could lose fisheries and other water-related industry, and lose wetlands. Water supply issues including saltwater intrusion are a concern for people who use groundwater supplies.
  • Agriculture is expected to be affected positively by increased CO2 but negatively by the increased need for invasive plant control. Salt-water intrusion in coastal areas would affect acrigulture. Droughts would stress crops.
  • "A primary response to climate change in the State may be a 2º F rise in air temperature by 2030 and 8º F increase by 2100". The increase in temperature may draw more desirable fish species into the Chesapeake Bay but provide less habitat due to decreased dissolved oxygen. Droughts could increase fish diseases.
  • The maple syrup industry is at risk

Arm yourself with these quotes:

Impacts of sea level rise include shoreline erosion, flooding, inundation, and changes in salinity and water temperature...In addition, costs of sea level rise may include damage to valuable beachfront real estate, scenic roads, and infrastructure such as sewers...Approximately 1000 square miles of land in Maryland and Virginia could be inundated by the tides if sea level rises two feet.

Much of Maryland’s loss of forestland is occurring where the trees are needed most, in the urbanized areas of the State. Forests are especially crucial in urbanized areas. One acre of young healthy trees will absorb 2.5 tons of carbon dioxide and give off 2 tons of oxygen each year. Trees also contribute to the improvement of air quality, help control water runoff, moderate the effects of urban heat islands, and often represent the presence of recreational and park spaces.

If Maryland were an independent country, it would rank 13th worldwide in terms of total CO2 emissions.

I will talk about contributions to the climate change problem from Maryland in our next post.

Tuesday, April 3, 2007

Fighting against the Gore-god

I had a good time reading the article at this website about how the "climate change is fake" people beat the "climate change is real" people in a debate that was suppressed by the media. Meanwhile, NOAA scientists are turning in their graves, except that they are still alive, no thanks to the Bush Administration. Too bad Clarrence Darrow and William Jennings Bryan aren't around anymore. What I am trying to say, people, is that we are descended from monkeys regardless of who won the debate.

But what is even better is that some yahoo begged the literati of the site for advice on how to out-argue the other commenters on News-Post articles who believe in Global Warming. They gave him some very practical advice on how to counter the "accolytes" who "have been on the mountain and seen the truth revealed by the al 'the guru' gore." Let's share their advice:

  • Laugh at them
  • Combine with factual rebuttals [if you have any-- ha ha my addition]
  • screech loudly
  • target Gore for hypocrisy

Well I for one am unimpressed by the rhetorical devices but unfortunately they seem to work on a lot of people.

P.S. The Supreme Court thinks you people are loony.

Supreme Court forces EPA to control GHG

This is so absolutely huge, I just love it. A bunch of cities and states sued the Environmental Protection Agency to force it to regulate greenhouse gases as an air pollutant under the Clean Air Act. Yesterday they WON. Visit this article to read about the juicy details- how the Bush Administration tried to assert that EPA did not have the authority or the will to limit greenhouse gas emissions, and suppressed the voices of its top scientists that urged for action, only to be overruled by our highest court. '"The harms associated with climate change are serious and well recognized," said judge John Paul Stevens as the ruling was carried by five votes in favor to four against.' Read it and weep. The only concern- four of the justices actually voted against this decision. They can live with the humiliation when we all look back and say what a pack of idiots they were. Can you say Dredd Scott?

Monday, April 2, 2007

Scraping the minds of the masses

So I had this conversation with an older friend of ours that Shelvis plays music with and he had some interesting thoughts. They amount to:

  • If the global ocean conveyor shuts down as a result of the melting ice then we'll have an ice age;
  • Humans can't possibly make enough impact to do this because the earth is self-healing;
  • And it doesn't matter because the world will end in 2012;
  • And nobody's going to do anything anyway.

Anyway, old timer managed to pull off sharp, hippy, crazy, and nihilistic all at the same time. Folks, there's a little in Global Warming for every unique personality. Love conspiracies? Our research at the Global Warming public relations lab (AKA my brain) have discovered that Global Warming is a left-wing conspiracy designed to promote Al Gore and get money for liberal scientists, that global warming dissenters have been suppressed, and that there's TONS of evidence to the contrary! Feeling humble? Well then you'll love the theory that humans aren't powerful enough to screw up the earth's systems in such a short period of time- or if we are, that Gaia will heal itself! Feeling fatalistic? Fixate on the fact that we're all going to die in the apocalypse or that people are not going to pull together to fix the problem. There's so many ways to ignore Global Warming- one of them is custom fit to you. Remember- if global warming were real, we wouldn't have snow.